An Analysis of ISIS and its Relation to Traditional Islam

In todays world it is easy to clutch that ISIS and handed-down Islam ar the same thing. The intelligence often reports phrases interchangeable alkali Islamist terrorists and radical Islam. Has society made a align assumption? Are all large number who follow Islam potential terrorists? Does Islam coverk to hike up such terrorist behaviors? This paper seeks to address these questions and bring on the differences amongst the cardinal, if any. conventional IslamTraditional Islam began e rattlingplace 1,500 years ago and currently has roughly 1.6 billion fol set downs. The word Islam actually centre submission to God. on that pointfore, a Muslim is soul who strives to submit to God.Islam has spread completely just about the world. You washbasin find Muslims in northmost and South America, horse opera Europe, Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. Their fountainhead homelands lie in the argona comm merely referred to as the 10/40 window (between 10 degrees latitudin al north and 40 degrees latitudinal north ranging from the eastern military position of North Africa to the western side of Asia). mass of Muslims be Asian (60%) and the rest ar Arab (22%) sub-Sahara Afri toilet (12%) and Eastern European (5%) . Islam was founded in 610 A.D. by a man named Mohammed. During Mohammeds time, polytheism reigned, and nation were worshipping more gods at the same time. Mohammed had a vision from a being he thought to be an angel who told him, There is completely one God, and His name is Allah. righteousness Him.Islam, at its core, is a theology establish on faith, life sentence, piety, freedom, religion, intermission, and morality. Researcher Sohaib Sultan states Islam believes in a God of mercy, a record of mercy, and a Prophet who was sent as a mercy to all the world.ISISISIS began in 2003 as a blowback of the U.S. aggression and dysfunction of Iraq. In the earliest interpret in that location were several Sunni extremist radicals who wer e rubbish back with the U.S. in hopes to provoke a civil contend. The host, at that time, was called al fundament which was in Iraq with Abu Musab al-Zarqawi in command pledging subjection to Osama bin Laden. Zarqawi was killed during a 2006 U.S. airstrike, nonwithstanding the group continued . ISIS is a post-al Qaeda terrorist group.With e actuallyplace 30,000 fighters, ISIS holds territorial lands in both Syria and Iraq. It maintains an panoptic military operation, controls communications, controls infrastructure, and funds itself. It can be give tongue to that ISIS is a pseudo-state which is led by their military. The goal of ISIS is to control certain territories in that respectby creating a pure Sunni Islamist state that is goerned by a strict interpretation of shariah law Law. It also seeks to remove the semipolitical borders that the Western governments created in the Middle Eastern regions. ISIS seeks to depart the sole political, military, and apparitional aut hority over all the Muslims in the world. ISIS core depicted object is more about power and strike back than anything else.Differences between ISIS and Traditional IslamIn the outset section of this paper we saw that traditiona argumentic Islam is a comparatively peaceful religion that stresses mercy and peace. This is significantly in contest with the agenda of ISIS. Where do these two paths continue? What is the relationship between terrorist groups such as ISIS, Al Qaeda, Boko Haram, Al Shabab in Somalia, the Taliban with conventional Islam? galore(postnominal) mickle believe that ISIS is a group that is based on the religious beliefs of Islam including following the examples of the Prophet Mohammed . This is where most of the disorderliness comes into play. ISIS personas Islam as a vehicle to drop out their political agenda by reinterpreting the fundamental meaning and purpose of Islam. In separate words, they be twisting the leger to regularize what they want it t o by distort lies in with the truth and preying on the ignorance of the batch.The pith of ISIS is vastly spread non only by social media, but by means of certain mosques as well. Researcher Ian Pelletier suggests the motivations of ISIS arMarket and Reinforce Emphasizes consistency of Moslem States strategic objectives with mainstream Muslim Law.Obfuscation Ignores/blurs contradictions between Moslem States strategic objectives and mainstream Islamic Law.Leveraging Connects atomic number 18as in which Islamic State strategic objectives are logical with mainstream Islamic Law to social endeavour catalysts in order to gain momentum.Reinterpretation Justifies a radical reinterpretation of Islamic Law as essential to address past issues or current shortfalls deep down society and collapse the strategic objectives of the Islamic State. ISIS interprets Islam from a genuinely radical point of view that is root in the extremist fraction of Salafi/Wahhabi Islam within the H anbali Sunni tradition .The strategic goals of ISIS are as followsPermanently break down political boundaries and cultivate conditions for government failure and regional sectarian civil struggle in Iraq and Syria.Establish the Islamic Caliphate by controlling terrain across Iraq and Syria, governing the population within, and defending against orthogonal threats.Bring akin-minded raft to fight on board and settle within the Islamic Caliphate. cover the territory of the Caliphate to connect with the wider Muslim community. Traditional Islamic Law ( shariah) is based on the account book which follows the hadith or the teachings of Mohammad. It is traditionally viewed as a statement of relatively easy limits and not a etymon of strict and inflexible rules to be enforce in any circumstance . It is say to be based on the predate of justice and equality for everyone . Historically it has been obdurate that Islamic Law had the most clement and liberal fundamental principles as it fostered peace with self and society. Groups such as ISIS use Islamic Law instead for raspy discipline and to control the people.Sharia, as it was primitively intended, was used as a guidepost for societal norms and values. It served as a specimen in which one could pattern their life after. Some of the some(prenominal) positive attributes of Sharia are a belief in God, daily prayers, asking/receiving forgiveness, freedoms of choice, strong whizz of community, love your neighbors, exercise self-control, do not abuse religion to exploit or abuse others, and must respect the rights of others.Conflicts Between ISIS and Mainstream Moderate MuslimsThere defend been many practicing Muslims who do not agree with nor follow to the beliefs of extremists fringe groups such as ISIS. In an open letter from 120 Islamic scholars and clerics to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, they challenged ISISs routes as being un-Islamic. They encourage claimed that ISIS routinely twists and perverts Islami c Law egotistically to achieve their own agenda.The letter went on to illustrate the contradictions between ISISs theology and that of traditional Islamic Law. The scholars accused them of citing only portions of the script without taking the whole spirit of the script and Hadith into account. It was also noted that ISIS had a practice of killing innocent people and that jihad was only meant for defensive measures during a war. Offensive measures of Jihad, without proper cause, was equal to condemn qualified conduct and was not acceptable in traditional Islam . The letter also went on to say that Islam forbids the mistreatment of Christians and no one can be forced to convert to Islam against their will. causality Wael Hallaq states that, Sharia is not a rigid unchanging Law of God and when applied correctly, it is flexible. The way it is interpreted and implemented by ISIS makes it a little more than a list of fixed punishments, ritual requirements and oppressive rules that are enforced with coercion upon a marginalized group of people. In addition, it is increasingly clear that ISIS selectively interprets Sharia.One may ask how ISIS is able to get away with using Islamic Law to achieve its objectives. They accomplish this by convincing people that their views are in fact inline with mainstream Islamic traditions. They have a knack for rationalizing any perceived contradictions that are found within their belief and the traditional teachings.Al-Baghdadi, while addressing his fighters said, Beware, O lions, the state that they reach a Muslim woman or child or sheikh without you, for if this happens, then, by God, you have no excuse for yourselves in the lead me. Look to yourselves and do not be a place of blame. Put their bodies in the beginning yours. Their blood beforehand yours and their fortune before yours, and beware of being happy to expire in a day when the watch over of a Muslim woman is transgressed, or the blood of a child is spilled, or an e lderly sheikh is insulted, for what deliciousness can there be in life if this is in it or even a part of it?While his speech is panegyrical with Islamic Law in principle, he is trying to energize his fighters to fight in a war that is not justify tally to Islamic Law. He stresses that not only is the war just, but it is according to Islamic Law which it a uncivil lie. They may sincerely believe that their war is justified callable to their extremist views, but according to traditional Islamic Law, they are not qualified to wage war with anyone unless it is a defensive measure. ISIS does not make in defensive measures as a rulethey are very sickening in their tactics.ConclusionExtremists groups, such as ISIS, claim to be Islamic in their beliefs, but they do not stick to to the basic tenants of the faith. They twist and turn the Quran and Hadith to make it say any(prenominal) they need it to say that will bring forward their agenda.ISIS is a violent terrorist group that has been attracting many young people. They seek out those who are vulnerable, who are seeking religious righteousness, adventure, power, and a sense of belonging. They are also cognise for producing sexual opportunities for the young men by keeping women as slaves. This is extremely mutually exclusive to traditional teachings and philosophy of traditional Islam.It is for certain a disservice to the majority of Muslims to study that all Muslims are somehow affiliated to terrorist activities. In America, ever since September 11th, 2001, there has been a remarkable increase of military unit and hatred against Muslims from such assumptions.Extremists groups are not representative of what it means to be a Muslim in todays world. We need to see them for who they are and not for the vehicle they vituperate which is Islam. Furthermore, it is very unhelpful when the media keeps reporting phrases like radical Islam and Muslim extremists as this provided perpetuates the discrimination and hatred against innocent and pacific Muslims.There is no link between ISIS terrorism and traditional Islam. ISIS fundamentally changes the core beliefs of Islam and inserts their own interpretations to make it into something that is self-serving.Extremists can be found in most religions. The only way to combat this is to be very knowledgeable of your own religion and beliefs so that you will recognize a imposition when you hear it. Sadly, many people patently believe what they are told and that is it. Such people can be easily caught up in extremist groups as they over belief knowledge.The same can be said for Christianity. We are not exempt from those who have perverted Gods Word to make it say something that it never was intended to say. This is how cults are formed, and again, is due to a wish of knowledge. The bible says that the people perish due to a lack of knowledge (Hosea 46).ISIS operates via intimidation, fear, legalistic authority, assassinations, and bombings . This is nothing like what traditional Islam teaches. In fact, it is quite the opposite. It is not fair to classify all Muslims by such rouge fringe groups.For two years I worked and lived in an Islamic country. I never met anyone who was associated with ISIS nor any other extremist group. I found the Muslims there to be very friendly, eager to help, and welcoming. That get down really helped me to see them for who they really are and without the media bias that was projected to me.Many Muslims do not even consider groups such as ISIS to be true Muslims. They look at them in disdain as the perverters of Islam. Usually these are the more ameliorate people who know what Islam is supposed to be. Sadly, a lot of Muslims have a lower educational level which would be very conducive to being led astray. Many modern Muslims are Muslim in name only and not in practice which makes them an easy target for extremists.